![softpaw gay furry porn comic softpaw gay furry porn comic](https://h.hentaitorrents.com/pic/202102/08/933479e.jpg)
I don't if you just don't read my posts or something but I said: Your rating: None Average: 2.8 ( 15 votes) However that does not at all mean the videos are good or that their production should be supported, just that it's a better situation than the alternative. If your goal is to reduce the number of children that are molested and if child pornography reduces the number of people that molest children then allowing those videos is the most effective way to reduce harm to children. The question then becomes, based on available evidence, what do you want to achieve and what is the most effective way to achieve that. There is also evidence that watching the videos can prevent those that would harm children from harming them, in which case allowing those videos, but no their production, could overall reduce the harm to children. The creation of the videos is harmful and must be dealt with but watching the videos is not directly harmful to any individual. There are those that create the videos and those that watch the videos. It's important to note here, and you too Crossie, that any release of the videos is not done for the benefit of the people watching it but for the benefit of potential victims.
![softpaw gay furry porn comic softpaw gay furry porn comic](https://xxgasm.com/wp-content/upload/2020/07/gay_furry_-9728.jpg)
That almost certainly is the case and so the next question is whether, as happens in many other situations, whether those rights should be suspended for overall benefit. It might be that the videos should not be shown for violating the child's rights. One way that this can circumvented is to say the body becomes the property of the family and therefore misuse of the body or person's memory is a violation of their rights. Aside from emotional carry-over from when they were alive they have no more claim to rights than any other inanimate object. Once someone is dead they are no longer aware in any sense, no longer are moral beings and can not experience having their rights violated. Though I must question what rights a past person could possibly have. I'm not sure who Clementi is but I'd imagine the situation there is rather different, though I can't tell you why cause I don't know the specifics. Your rating: None Average: 4.1 ( 9 votes) There are in fact support groups for paedophiles that do not want to harm children and their involuntary desires can cause great mental distress to them.Įdit: It was the Czech Republic, as it's also mentioned in a link in a post below. They are overlapping groups but child molesters are not all paedophiles and vice versa. If that's true then on balance it might be best to allow consumption of child porn while outlawing production, similar to Portugal and some other countries' stance on drugs.Īlso worth bearing in mind is that paedophile (who would watch child porn) is not the same thing as child molester (who acts against children). I think that came from data in Czechslovakia which at one point decriminalised child porn and saw a drop in the number of sexual offences against children, while all other crimes remained stable. Once it's produced there is very little extra harm that is produced and there has been evidence that consumption of child porn might lower the number of sexual assaults on children. A compromise might be to prosecute those that create child porn, which is directly harmful, but it may be prudent to let consumption, not directly harmful, slide. There's another point that's also good to consider. On the other hand a real child was harmed to produce it and the consumption may lead to more children being harmed. Watching child porn is not directly harmful to children. Your rating: None Average: 3.8 ( 12 votes) The account was closed later on the same day. Unfortunately, I cannot tell anyone why, but something awful occurred the other day and those who are close to Mizzy and have been privy to his confessions will have a very good idea of what I'm referring to.
![softpaw gay furry porn comic softpaw gay furry porn comic](https://static1.e621.net/data/6c/af/6caff20c91e2d1ce6c83dccbd1a435b4.png)
no longer be participating in online activities for an undetermined length of time. He also maintained an art account on Inkbunny where, the day after the arrest, a message appeared, ostensibly from his sister. Mizzyam contributed to issue #4 of the erotic cub fanzine Softpaw Magazine. Four computers and "other items" were seized. Shalapata was charged with "making child pornography available and two counts of possession of child pornography".
![softpaw gay furry porn comic softpaw gay furry porn comic](https://www.erofus.com/thumb/3998/58cfe9e4ebf349182409839.jpeg)
Known in the real world as Michael Shalapata, the 24-year-old resident of Hamilton, Ontario was taken into custody on November 1 by members of the Ontario Provincial Police Child Sexual Exploitation Unit and the Hamilton Police Service Internet Child Exploitation Unit. Your rating: None Average: 4.1 ( 16 votes)įurry artist Mizzyam, also known as MisterNivens and Amarimasi, has been arrested after a month-long Internet child-pornography investigation.